Comments on: 2009 Top 100 Outfielders Part 1: 100-51 http://paulsporer.com/2009/01/02/2009-top-100-outfielders-part-1-100-51/ Easily the greatest sport ever... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:17:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: The 2008 GRITTIES | GRIT BLOG http://paulsporer.com/2009/01/02/2009-top-100-outfielders-part-1-100-51/#comment-13061 Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:51:23 +0000 http://pauls.wordpress.com/?p=520#comment-13061 [...] they needed an outfielder and the only options were you and Josh Anderson. Unfortunately, this other random guy on the internet ranks him 95th on a list of the top 100 outfielders. Fortunately, that’s not saying a whole lot, since there are 30 teams, each of which needs 3 [...]

]]> By: The 2008 GRITTIES at GRIT http://paulsporer.com/2009/01/02/2009-top-100-outfielders-part-1-100-51/#comment-13060 Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:50:31 +0000 http://pauls.wordpress.com/?p=520#comment-13060 [...] they needed an outfielder and the only options were you and Josh Anderson. Unfortunately, this other random guy on the internet ranks him 95th on a list of the top 100 outfielders. Fortunately, that’s not saying a whole lot, since there are 30 teams, each of which needs 3 [...]

]]> By: 2009 Top 100 Outfielders Part 3: 10-1 « Baseball By Paul http://paulsporer.com/2009/01/02/2009-top-100-outfielders-part-1-100-51/#comment-12828 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:29:59 +0000 http://pauls.wordpress.com/?p=520#comment-12828 [...] Part 1: 100-51 Part 2: 50-11 [...]

]]> By: 2009 Top 100 Outfielders Part 2: 50-11 « Baseball By Paul http://paulsporer.com/2009/01/02/2009-top-100-outfielders-part-1-100-51/#comment-12825 Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:27:10 +0000 http://pauls.wordpress.com/?p=520#comment-12825 [...] Part 1: 100-51 [...]

]]> By: Lucky http://paulsporer.com/2009/01/02/2009-top-100-outfielders-part-1-100-51/#comment-12818 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:59:32 +0000 http://pauls.wordpress.com/?p=520#comment-12818 Paul,

Excellent breakdown, very informative and insightful. It is obvious a lot of hard work went into this, and it is appreciated.

Lucky

]]>